Monday, October 30, 2017

Assignment for Wednesday, Nov. 1

Thinking about gender and human flourishing is not a digression for me, though I understand if it seems like one. 

There are many more traditional tie-ins that we could explore now:  the effects of the fact that most medical experiments are done on male bodies, the effects of the fact that most characterizations of illness (especially heart disease) are drawn from descriptions of male bodies, the ethics of surgically “creating” a male or female body when a child is born with “ambiguous” genital anatomy, and of course, the whole cluster of issues around how gender preferences play into uses of reproductive technology.  (We will read one article about that.)

But two things are on my mind.

1)  I want to not read for a little bit. 
2)  Gender is so pervasive that it is invisible.  

So here’s your assignment.  

a)  Find some friends of yours, of your own gender.  This needs collective input.  They don’t need to be other students in class.

b)  Discuss this topic in an organized way.  Question:  on a typical day, what _would I do differently_ if I were another gender?  So your job is to collect answers and make a list.  (Even small things, like grooming.)   It can be handwritten, but take it seriously.  At every moment, for every kind of thing that happens in a typical day, what would they be doing, or how would things _be happening_, differently from the way it all works now. 

c)  Bring this to class.  

(Note:  this can be an unexpectedly touchy subject, since the expenses of gender strike people very differently.  So try to make sure that your list is respectful and thoughtful.) 

New Gene Therapy Strategy for Deafness

Pretty much exaclty the sort of thing Chadwick and Levitt were foreseeing, back when they wrote the paper we read:  LINK.

Sunday, October 29, 2017

Disability



Some great and relevant links, with thanks to Annie!


The history of disability:  LINK

Disability and The Simpsons:  LINK

"...ableism–the conscious and unconcious ways that people tend to discrimnate against disabled people."  LINK


Friday, October 27, 2017

Wednesday, October 25, 2017

Developments in Gene Editing

Anyone really think that this will only ever be used to address disease???   HERE

Minority Representation in Medical Research

A troubling, but not surprising, problem.  We'll talk more about these things, but it is in the news now: HERE.

Assignment for Friday, Oct. 27

So on reflection, I realize that we really did hear a lot of voices in our conversation today.  Thank you for that.  Let's read the next (long-ish) essay.  No summary.  Because you've earned it.

Monday, October 23, 2017

Assingment for Wednesday, Oct. 25

Read 105-110.  I think that those are the pages.  It's just the next article after the one we just read.

I'm not going to assign a summary, because I am really pleased with how well we're doing. 

But please do read it and come ready to talk about it.  And I really like hearing the voices of the less-heard members of the class.  I'm not going to name names (Andy, Jordan, Daniel, Trey, Regan, Brianna, Christa...).  So let's keep it up. 


Sunday, October 22, 2017

Friday, October 20, 2017

Assignment for Monday, Oct. 23

Read and summarize 91-99.

I bet you'll see why I trace all of these issues, too, to questions I want to ask about the impulse to have one's "own biological" children.

I also want to keep saying that my skepticism goes hand in hand with a genuine sensitivity to those who experience difficulty (or impossibility) in having children.  Their pain can be profound, and we should keep that in sight.

Wednesday, October 18, 2017

Assignment for Friday, Oct. 20

OK, read and summarize 86-90, by Parfit.  This is tricky, so don't be fooled by the short length.  Start early. 

Sunday, October 15, 2017

CLASS CANCELED

No class on Monday, October 16.  We'll pick up again on Wednesday.   --C

Monday, October 9, 2017

Assignment for Wednesday, Oct. 11

I want you to read some online stuff.

LINK1

LINK2

LINK3

LINK4  At this site, look around the links, watch the videos, etc.

No summaries.  But be ready to talk.

--C



Tired of Life

What do we think about a request for aid in dying if there's no illness at all???

Read about it HERE.

Monday, October 2, 2017

Assignment for Wednesday, Oct. 4

One of philosophy's jobs is to ask if we can be better.  That is, it asks about how we live, our patterns.

People who do not want to ask those questions look for ways to evade them.  One of the most handy is to retreat to some scientific explanation of behavior.

And believe me, any behavior at all can be justified by some finding somewhere. 

Even a developmental necessity for Santa Claus! 

Philosophers are VERY well aware of the human tendency to avoid the truth.  No one needs social science to tell us that we are devoted to our illusions.

I believe that my own research (in our own class) shows that few of you would accept, as an excuse for your partner's cheating, a social-scientific justification. 

Even if social science (psychology?  neuroscience?  sociology?  sociobiology???) tells you that we are bound to cheat, you are likely to think that there's a moral issue, a betrayal, a dishonesty, a hurtful and selfish choice, etc. 
 
So my point is that a social scientific answer can't (easily) help with a moral phenomenon.  It takes courage to ask a challenging moral question without retreating to some comfortable generalization. 

But that's our job here, for about seven more weeks.

Read 353-356.  Short but grim.  I don't need a summary.  But I am likely to quiz you on it.