OK, we’re going off-road. I want to try to weigh Savulescu’s very stringent criteria for autonomy against a famous case.
(This is something you should get to soon.)
So first, read THIS.
Then THIS.
Then re-read Savalescu (or parts of it).
And then write a two-page (max) thing.
One page is how Savalescu would handle Cowart’s case—this is to show me that you get Savalescu.
Then
the second page is about whether or not you’d handle (or think about)
Cowart’s case in the same way (as Savalescu). And why.
So that’s two pages MAX. Single or double spaced—I never care about that, I care about number of pages MAX.
Due Monday. In class. No lateness accepted.
Looking forward to our discussion.
—Chris
PS:
There are also some good videos (on YouTube) of Dax Cowart talking
about his case, and you are free to consult those to get a fuller idea
of his stance on things.
No comments:
Post a Comment
If you can't get a comment to post, feel free to email it to me--I can post it for you. --C